cd62p-blocking antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
Structured Review

Cd62p Blocking Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cd62p-blocking antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Delivering LINE1 antisense oligonucleotides via endothelial targeting extracellular vesicles to ameliorate myocardial infarction-induced cardiac senescence"
Article Title: Delivering LINE1 antisense oligonucleotides via endothelial targeting extracellular vesicles to ameliorate myocardial infarction-induced cardiac senescence
Journal: Bioactive Materials
doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.07.008
Figure Legend Snippet: CD62E and CD62P have the capacity to serve as potential targets for MI treatment. (A) RT‒qPCR analysis showing the gene expression of various adhesion molecules, including CD62E, CD62P, CD54, CD106, and CD31, in cardiomyocytes, cardiac fibroblasts, and HUVECs after 24 h of OGD treatment (n = 4). (B) Western blot analysis and quantitative data showing the expression of CD62E and CD62P in cells after 24 h of OGD treatment (n = 3). (C) Representative images of immunofluorescence staining of CD62E and CD62P in HUVECs 24 h after OGD treatment (n = 5). Scale bar, 50 μm. (D) Representative images of CD62E, CD62P and α-Actinin immunofluorescence staining in ischemic ventricular tissue (n = 4). Scale bar, 100 μm. All the data are expressed as the mean ± s.d. Significant differences were determined via one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD multiple comparison post hoc test. ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01.
Techniques Used: Gene Expression, Western Blot, Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: In vitro assessment of the cargo transfer capacity and therapeutic potential of SBP-LINE1-EVs. (A) Experimental design for assessing the permeation effect of SBP-EVs through HUVEC monolayers. (B-D) Representative images of DiI-labeled EVs, DiI-labeled SBP-EVs and α-Actinin immunofluorescence staining of CMs in the lower chamber under normoxic conditions (B) and OGD-induced stress conditions (C) . The intensity of DiI signals in the CMs was quantified (n = 6) (D) . An anti-CD62E antibody and/or anti-CD62P antibody was added to the upper chamber of the hypoxic system for 2 h to block CD62E and/or CD62P in HUVECs after pretreatment with OGD. Scale bar, 50 μm. (E) Immunofluorescence staining of 5-FAM-labeled LINE1-ASO delivery and α-Actinin. FAM-labeled LINE1-ASO was electroporated into EVs, and FAM-LINE1-ASO-containing SBP-EVs were added to the upper chamber of the transwell and incubated for 6 h. Scale bar, 50 μm. (F) The degree of CM senescence was analyzed via β-gal staining after the internalization of SBP-LINE1-EVs, which penetrated from the upper chamber to the lower chamber of the transwell. β-gal-positive CMs under different conditions were quantified (n = 3). Scale bar, 100 μm. (G) The expression level of LINE1 in CMs was analyzed via RT‒qPCR (n = 4). (H) Representative images of β-gal-stained CMs after treatment with Scrambled ASO-packaged SBP-EVs or LINE1-ASO-packaged SBP-EVs for 24 h. Scale bar, 100 μm; n = 3. All the data are expressed as the mean ± s.d. P values were calculated via one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD multiple comparison post hoc test. ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Labeling, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Blocking Assay, Incubation, Expressing, Comparison
